Current:Home > reviewsRuling keeps abortion question on ballot in South Dakota -BrightFutureFinance
Ruling keeps abortion question on ballot in South Dakota
View
Date:2025-04-17 20:50:28
A state court judge’s ruling Monday keeps an abortion-rights question on the November ballot in South Dakota.
Judge John Pekas dismissed a lawsuit filed by an anti-abortion group, Life Defense Fund, that sought to have the question removed even though supporters turned in more than enough valid signatures to put it on the ballot.
“They have thrown everything they could dream up to stop the people of South Dakota from voting on this matter,” Adam Weiland, co-founder of Dakotans for Health, said in a statement after the ruling. “This is another failed effort by a small group opposed to giving women the option to terminate pregnancies caused by rape and incest or to address dangerous pregnancies affecting the life and health of women.”
Republican Rep. Jon Hansen, who is a co-chair of the Life Defense Fund, and a lawyer for the group did not immediately return messages from The Associated Press on Monday.
South Dakota is one of 14 states now enforcing a ban on abortion at every stage of pregnancy, a possibility the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door to in 2022, when it overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the nationwide right to abortion.
The amendment supported by Dakotans for Health would bar the state from regulating “a pregnant woman’s abortion decision and its effectuation” in the first trimester, but it would allow second-trimester regulations “only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman.”
Since Roe was overturned, all seven statewide abortion-related ballot measures have gone the way abortion-rights groups wanted them to.
This year, similar questions are on the ballots in five states, plus a New York equal rights question that would ban discrimination based on “pregnancy outcomes,” among other factors.
Advocates are waiting for signatures to be verified to get questions on the ballot this year in four more states, including Nebraska, where there could be competing questions on abortion rights before voters.
veryGood! (249)
Related
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- PGA's deal with LIV Golf plan sparks backlash from 9/11 families and Human Rights Watch
- Today’s Climate: July 24-25, 2010
- Trump informed he is target of special counsel criminal probe
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Environmental Groups Sue to Block Trump’s Endangered Species Act Rule Changes
- Robert De Niro Reveals He Welcomed Baby No. 7
- Amazon Fires Spark Growing International Criticism of Brazil
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Bryan Miller, Phoenix man dubbed The Zombie Hunter, sentenced to death for 1990s murders of Angela Brosso and Melanie Bernas
Ranking
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Tupac Shakur posthumously receives star on Hollywood Walk of Fame
- Families fear a ban on gender affirming care in the wake of harassment of clinics
- Shakira Seemingly References Gerard Piqué Breakup During Billboard’s Latin Women in Music Gala
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Suburbs delivered recent wins for Georgia Democrats. This year, they're up for grabs
- Climate Change Is Transforming the Great Barrier Reef, Likely Forever
- Wildfire smoke-laden haze could hang around Northeast and beyond for days, experts warn
Recommendation
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
Why pediatricians are worried about the end of the federal COVID emergency
Can a Climate Conscious Diet Include Meat or Dairy?
El Niño is officially here and could lead to new records, NOAA says
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
They inhaled asbestos for decades on the job. Now, workers break their silence
A town employee who quietly lowered the fluoride in water has resigned
Get $200 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Anti-Aging Skincare for Just $38