Current:Home > StocksShe took a ‘ballot selfie.’ Now she’s suing North Carolina elections board for laws that ban it -BrightFutureFinance
She took a ‘ballot selfie.’ Now she’s suing North Carolina elections board for laws that ban it
View
Date:2025-04-27 16:18:56
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A woman is suing the North Carolina elections board over state laws that ban most photography in polling places after she took a selfie with her ballot in March.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Eastern District Court of North Carolina by Susan Hogarth.
The lawsuit centers around a letter Hogarth said she received from the North Carolina State Board of Elections asking her to remove a post on X that included a selfie she took with her completed ballot during the March primary election.
She says the letter and the laws underpinning it are unconstitutional. She is suing the Board of Elections and the Wake County Board of Elections.
Hogarth, a Wake County resident, took a “ballot selfie” in her voting booth on March 5, the lawsuit said. She then posted her selfie on X, endorsing presidential and gubernatorial candidates for the Libertarian Party — something she does to “challenge the narrative that voters can only vote for major party candidates,” according to the lawsuit.
The suit says Hogarth received a letter two weeks later from a state Board of Elections investigator asking her to take down the post, or she could face a misdemeanor charge. Hogarth refused.
“It would have been easier to just take the post down,” Hogarth said in a statement. “But in a free society, you should be able to show the world how you voted without fear of punishment.”
Photography and videography of voters in a polling place is mostly illegal in North Carolina unless permission is granted by a “chief judge of the precinct.” Photographing completed ballots is also prohibited under state law.
One reason for outlawing ballot photos, the state elections board says, is to prevent them from being used “as proof of a vote for a candidate in a vote-buying scheme.”
The North Carolina State Board of Elections declined to comment on the litigation. The Wake County Board of Elections did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Most states have passed laws permitting ballot selfies and other photography, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Some states, such as Arizona, ban photos from being taken within a certain radius of a polling place. Other states, such as Indiana, have seen ballot photography laws struck down by federal judges because they were found unconstitutional.
Now, Hogarth and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression are trying to do the same in North Carolina.
FIRE contends North Carolina’s ballot photography laws violate the First Amendment. The complaint adds that the state would need to demonstrate real concerns of vote-buying schemes that outweigh the right to protected speech.
“Ballot selfie bans turn innocent Americans into criminals for nothing more than showing their excitement about how they voted, or even just showing that they voted,” said Jeff Zeman, an attorney at FIRE. “That’s core political speech protected by the First Amendment.”
The plaintiff’s goal is to stop enforcement of the law before the November general election, in part because Hogarth is a Libertarian Party candidate running for a state legislative seat and she plans to take another selfie to promote herself, according to the lawsuit.
veryGood! (51448)
Related
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Collin Gosselin Pens Message of Gratitude to Dad Jon Amid New Chapter
- Twitter will limit uses of SMS 2-factor authentication. What does this mean for users?
- Reimagining Coastal Cities as Sponges to Help Protect Them From the Ravages of Climate Change
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- The TVA’s Slower Pace Toward Renewable Energy Weakens Nashville’s Future
- Inside Clean Energy: A Steel Giant Joins a Growing List of Companies Aiming for Net-Zero by 2050
- Renting a home may be more financially prudent than buying one, experts say
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- ESPYS 2023: See the Complete List of Nominees
Ranking
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Warming Trends: At COP26, a Rock Star Named Greta, and Threats to the Scottish Coast. Plus Carbon-Footprint Menus and Climate Art Galore
- The NHL and Chemours Are Spreading ‘Dangerous Misinformation’ About Ice-Rink Refrigerants, a New Report Says
- Pennsylvania inmate captured over a week after making his escape
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Pharrell Williams succeeds Virgil Abloh as the head of men's designs at Louis Vuitton
- California woman released by captors nearly 8 months after being kidnapped in Mexico
- A Tesla driver was killed after smashing into a firetruck on a California highway
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
EPA to Send Investigators to Probe ‘Distressing’ Incidents at the Limetree Refinery in the U.S. Virgin Islands
Stars of Oppenheimer walk out of premiere due to actors' strike
We're talking about the 4-day workweek — again. Is it a mirage or reality?
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Inside Clean Energy: A Steel Giant Joins a Growing List of Companies Aiming for Net-Zero by 2050
Are you caught in the millennial vs. boomer housing competition? Tell us about it
No ideological splits, only worried justices as High Court hears Google case