Current:Home > ContactSignalHub-Colorado to release gray wolves: Here's when, where and why. -BrightFutureFinance
SignalHub-Colorado to release gray wolves: Here's when, where and why.
PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-09 12:45:45
DENVER ‒ Colorado officially launches a controversial experiment next month: State officials will release up to 10 gray wolves as mandated by a 2020 state law that unleashed proverbial howls of protest from opponents.
Wolves have SignalHublong been a divisive species, particularly in rural areas where many farmers and ranchers consider them an unacceptable risk to both humans and livestock. But for many Americans, they evoke a powerful and meaningful emotional connection with wild places and the natural world.
In keeping with that divide, Colorado voters barely approved the wolves' reintroduction, and the law received most of its support from liberal urban residents living far from where the wolves will be released.
Colorado is planning to release dozens of wolves captured from Oregon over time, with officials hoping that will be enough to ultimately create self-sustaining packs totaling 150-200 animals.
While many other western states today have healthy wolf populations, Colorado is home to only a handful of wild wolves after the species was largely exterminated nationally by the 1940s. Due to their near-elimination, wolves were among the first animals protected by the 1973 Endangered Species Act, which obligated the federal government to try restoring them to the landscape.
"The return of the wolf to Colorado has the potential to be an historic ecological success..." Michael Saul, Rockies and Plains field director for Defenders of Wildlife, said in a statement.
What's so controversial about wolves?
Backers of Colorado's reintroduction plan say that wolves are a natural and important part of the ecosystem in the West, and that humans had no right to exterminate them. They argue that safety concerns are wildly overblown, and that ranchers and farmers who lose livestock will be fairly compensated by taxpayers.
But farmers and ranchers consider wolves a dangerous threat to wildlife and stock alike. A single adult wolf can kill and eat as many as 20 elk annually, and ranchers worry they'll have to spend more protecting their cows and sheep, cutting into their already-thin margins.
Federal officials began relocating Canadian wolves into Yellowstone National Park in the mid-1990s, and then to other western states a decade later. Long-running court battles among the states, wildlife defenders, the federal government and other parties have complicated relocation and management efforts.
Today, wolves in the Lower 48 are protected from hunting under a 2022 federal court order that overruled a Trump administration decision to let state agencies permit people to hunt wolves in some states. Following that Trump decision, state officials in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho killed 20 wolves that stepped outside Yellowstone National Park.
Congress is currently considering a measure proposed by Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, a Republican, to overturn that court decision and give control back to the states so hunters can kill wolves if state officials conclude there are too many living in an area.
Colorado had to get special permission from the federal government to create and manage the new wolf pack. The existing wild wolves in the state likely moved down from Wyoming, according to officials, with evidence they have been breeding.
Where are the Colorado wolves coming from?
After approaching multiple other states, Colorado officials persuaded their counterparts in Oregon to let them trap and relocate up to 10 wolves this year. The wolves will be tranquilized, screened for diseases, tooth decay and other potential problems. The captured wolves chosen for relocation will be 1-5 years old, and both male and female. They will be trucked or flown to Colorado in "sturdy aluminum crates" before being released, wearing GPS trackers.
Several states refused to give Colorado wolves, in part because many conservative-led states generally oppose seeing wolf populations grow. Wyoming and Utah officials are worried that Colorado's new wolves will ignore state borders, and have already signaled they want Colorado to pay if the new wolves kill their livestock.
Colorado now plans to release up to 50 wolves captured from Oregon
“We are deeply grateful for Oregon’s partnership in this endeavor, and we are now one step closer to fulfilling the will of the voters in time,” Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said in a press release.
Where are the Colorado wolves being released?
The exact locations will be kept secret, but the wolves will generally be released on state or private land in a rural area of west-central Colorado. Officials who selected the release area considered the nearby human population and its political support for wolves, and access to prey animals like elk and deer. It's also far from borders with Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico, and tribal lands in southwest Colorado.
Specifically, the area generally includes the cities of Aspen, Gunnison and Glenwood Springs, but is otherwise largely rural with relatively few cattle or sheep ranches. The wolves are not being released onto federal land, although they will likely end up on it: 36% of Colorado is federal property.
A study from the 1995 wolf reintroductions in Yellowstone National Park found the animals moved as far as 140 miles from their release point, although most remained within 50 miles of the dropoff point. Federal officials say those newly introduced wolves killed 256 sheep and 41 cows on nearby ranches in the first eight years after their reintroduction to the park.
In 2021, wolves living in northern Colorado killed a 500-pound cow ‒ the first documented wolf kill of livestock in Colorado in at least 70 years.
veryGood! (63)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Stranger charged with break-in, murder in slaying of Detroit synagogue leader
- Gift card scams 2023: What to know about 'card draining' and other schemes to be aware of
- Woman suing over Kentucky abortion ban learns her embryo no longer has cardiac activity
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Former Denver Post crime reporter Kirk Mitchell dies of prostate cancer at 64
- NTSB says a JetBlue captain took off quickly to avoid an incoming plane in Colorado last year
- Lawsuits target Maine referendum aimed at curbing foreign influence in local elections
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Ancestry, 23&Me and when genetic screening gifts aren't fun anymore
Ranking
- Average rate on 30
- Australian court overturns woman’s 2-decade-old convictions in deaths of her 4 children
- Ricardo Drue, soca music star, dies at 38: 'This is devastating'
- These states will see a minimum-wage increase in 2024: See the map
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Washington state college student dies and two others are sickened in apparent carbon monoxide leak
- New sanctions from the US and Britain target Hamas officials who help manage its financial network
- What Tesla Autopilot does, why it’s being recalled and how the company plans to fix it
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
24 Games to Keep Everyone Laughing at Your Next Game Night
Texas judge finds officer not guilty in fatal shooting of pickup driver
What was the best movie of 2023? From 'Barbie' to 'Poor Things,' these are our top 10
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Friends and teammates at every stage, Spanish players support each other again at Cal
Rutgers football coach Greg Schiano receives contract extension, pay increase
Warriors' Draymond Green ejected for striking Suns center Jusuf Nurkic in head